Three Reasons Why The Heat Should Trade Dwyane Wade

Use your ← → (arrows) to browse

3.  The Heat Have No Draft Picks

In this day and age with a stricter CBA, and a luxury tax that severely punishes offenders, it’s becoming clearer and clearer that the best way to get your bang for your buck is by signing kids to rookie contracts.  For example, Norris Cole made $1.1 million this year and will make $2 million next year.  Why?  Because he’s on his rookie deal — if he wasn’t, Norris Cole would probably be getting paid $5-8 million a year.

In the upcoming 2013 draft, the Heat have no draft picks.




The Heat probably don’t even know what a draft pick even looks like.

If the Heat trade Dwyane Wade, they’d be able to shoot, like, 15 birds with one stone.  (Okay, I exaggerate, but seriously, hear me out.)

First Bird: They get rid of an aging superstar that’s commanding way too much money given his (lack) of current, and future production (a.k.a the “Make somebody else over-pay for this guy” play).

Second Bird: They receive draft picks (and good ones, to boot) so that they can get talented, young players, on really good contracts to support LeBron James (a.k.a, the “Getting your bang for your buck” play).

Third Bird:  This young(er) team goes on to win not one, not two…oh, you’ve already heard that line before?

So it wasn’t 15 birds, but it does make sense, and the bottom line is that the Miami Heat should seriously think about trading Dwyane Wade.

(And don’t even get me started on Chris Bosh.)

Use your ← → (arrows) to browse

Tags: Dwyane Wade Miami Heat

  • Allen Karmelin

    Statistics aren’t everything

    • whatdouknow

      True, but they do mean something. And I think they mean a lot more than people give them credit for.

      Either way, paying $20 million a year for a 32 year old player is way too much, especially when age and injury nearly cost you the NBA championship.

      • Jason Klenetsky

        Nearly? WTF does nearly mean? Heat won. Period.

  • Jeffrey Gebeau

    Spoken like somebody who has no clue what Wade means to the Heat.
    Go ahead. Trade him. Two things will happen.

    1. Wade will have a year like his comeback 09 season.

    No longer deferring to LeBron, he’ll return to the 27+ pts, 7+ asts player that he was previously. But, more importantly, Wade will be fueled by fresh doubt, which is like food to him. Except the thing is that he’ll be doing it for another team.

    2. LeBron will leave in the summer of 2014.

    Here’s where you betray your ignorance of the Heat. LeBron is in Miami for one reason, and it’s not South Beach, palm trees, weather, women, or Pat Riley. And now you want to trade that reason away.

    Without championship level superstar support (aka Wade), James won’t have the backing that he needs to win in 2014. But, even if the Heat were to title again, in that case, LeBron will figure that he can win anywhere, so why stay put when one of his best friends in life, a virtual brother to him, was shipped out?

    So, after 2014, the Heat have no James or Wade. Good plan! All is not lost, however. Maybe Chris Bosh can be convinced to stick around….

    • whatdouknow

      I understand that Wade is the face of the franchise. He put the Heat on the NBA map. He almost singlehandedly delivered the Heat’s first title in 2006. I understand all of that.

      However, it’s time to face reality, and the reality is that Wade is not worth $17-20 million a year. Not at age 31. Not with knees that are like jello. Not with his worst regular season and post season performances since his rookie season. He’s on the decline, and convincing yourself otherwise is delusional.

      To your second point, in 2014, Dwyane Wade will be 32. Chris Bosh will be 30. Do you really think you’re going to convince LeBron to stay by saying “Look, we have a 32 year old, washed-up, banged-up Dwyane Wade and a 30-year old Chris Bosh”? Or do you say, “Look, we just drafted three guys in one of the deepest drafts in recent memory (the 2014 draft is supposed to be pretty deep) and you have the chance to mold them into an exciting, young, championship team”? Which one is more convincing? Which one says, “We want to win?”

      Trading D-Wade and Chris Bosh gives the Heat a better shot at winning in the future. And while we should thank those two players for everything they’ve done for the Heat, the goal is to win championships, not overpay aging superstars.

      • Jason Klenetsky

        Ok, I see your point about thinking of the future. Wade is older, yes. Bad knees, yes. Overpaid, yes. Maybe Bosh and Wade would consider pay cuts? Why not, they are team guys. That was their thoughts when they decided to join forces. TEAM, not SELF. Riley can sell ice to Eskimo’s. The Heat played over 100 basketball games this season. So, yeah maybe Wade is older and has trouble with his knees. Nothing the offseason and some rest won’t take care of. The Heat have the Riley factor. He makes offers you can’t refuse. Dismissing Wade is a mistake. Plain and simple. Bosh had a great year and the Heat would not have accomplished what they did without him. One bad game(which he did all the little things in) does not make a season. You sound like a fair weather fan if you even are one at all.

  • Jason Klenetsky

    The Miami Heat are not the Miami Marlins. Wade is the face if the franchise and why fix something that isn’t broken. I say we watch them as they 3peat then go from there. I don’t think those stats account for a heart of a champion like Wade has. This article reminds me of all the Haters out there that said the Heat couldn’t repeat. Well, they did. Plus we have an ex-factor: Pat Riley. Never count out what that man is capable of.

  • Jason Klenetsky

    I don’t know what ass you pulled those crappy statistics from, must have been a Spurs fan with indigestion.